Kiren Rijiju defends prorogation delay, blames Congress for delimitation impasse
Union Minister Kiren Rijiju wrote to Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge, arguing that the 64‑day gap since the Monsoon Session’s adjournment is constitutionally permissible and that the Congress has repeatedly refused to meet on the delimitation amendment.

Minister Rijiju pushes back on Congress’ criticism of prorogation lag
Union Minister Kiren Rijiju on Monday sent a formal letter to Congress president and Rajya Sabha Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge, answering a complaint that the Monsoon Session of Parliament has not yet been prorogued despite 64 days having elapsed since the Houses were adjourned sine die on 13 August 2026.
Rijiju wrote that the Constitution does not prescribe a specific period within which a House must be prorogued after adjournment. “The mere fact that a House has not been prorogued during such an interval does not, by itself, give rise to any constitutional or procedural impropriety,” the minister said.
He bolstered his view with historic examples: the UPA‑led Parliament went 87 days without prorogation in 2008, and similar stretches occurred in 1987 (76 days), 1989 (54 days) and twice in the 2000s (49 days each in 2006 and 2013). These precedents, he argued, show that the current gap is not unprecedented.
Congress’ lack of cooperation on delimitation talks
The letter also addressed Kharge’s demand for an all‑party meeting before the Delimitation Amendment Bill is taken up. Rijiju listed three outreach letters sent on 16 March, 26 March and 12 April 2026, and noted a personal discussion with Kharge and a meeting with Rahul Gandhi during the Monsoon Session. Despite these attempts, he claimed the Congress “did not provide dates for discussion,” forcing the government to extend its consultations to other parties.
He named the DMK, Samajwadi Party, YSR Congress Party, Nationalist Congress Party, Shiv Sena (UBT), AIMIM and Biju Janata Dal as having been approached for support on the delimitation legislation.
Government’s next steps
Rijiju said the Centre remains “firmly willing” to hold constructive parliamentary engagement and hopes the Congress will play a “constructive role” rather than obstruct “important future legislations.” The minister indicated that a special session is likely to be convened later this month to consider the delimitation amendment and related constitutional changes, including the women's reservation bill.
Opposition’s stance
Congress leaders, including Kharge and general secretary Jairam Ramesh, continue to demand that both Houses be prorogued and that an all‑party dialogue be held before any further bills are introduced. They have also called for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and a pause on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
The exchange underscores a growing standoff ahead of the anticipated special session, with the government pointing to procedural precedents and outreach efforts, while the opposition insists on broader consensus before moving forward.
Key numbers
| What | Figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Days since adjournment | 64 | Minister Rijiju’s letter |
| Adjournment date | 13 August 2026 | Minister Rijiju’s letter |
| Outreach letters sent | 16 March, 26 March, 12 April 2026 | Minister Rijiju’s letter |
| Previous longest prorogation gap | 87 days (2008) | Minister Rijiju’s letter |
| Special session expected | Later October 2026 | Minister Rijiju’s letter |
In this story
| Name | Role in the story |
|---|---|
| Mallikarjun Kharge | Congress president and Rajya Sabha Leader of Opposition addressed in the letter |
| Indian National Congress | Opposition party criticised for not cooperating |
| Kiren Rijiju | Parliamentary Affairs Minister who wrote the letter |



