The India Decade

India rejects Pakistan-China border commission as 'theatrics' without legal basis

The Ministry of External Affairs says Islamabad and Beijing share no actual border and demands Pakistan immediately vacate occupied lands.

By The India Decade

Published

karakoram mountain range near the disputed border (file image)
karakoram mountain range near the disputed border (file image) · “The Karakoram Mountains” by Preston Rhea (CC BY-SA 2.0) via Wikimedia Commons

What happened

India has flatly rejected a new joint boundary commission set up by Pakistan and China, declaring that the two nations share no actual border and telling Islamabad to drop the "theatrics" and vacate occupied Indian territory.

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs issued the sharp rebuke on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, hours after Chinese and Pakistani officials held the inaugural meeting of the "Pakistan-China Boundary Joint Commission" in Islamabad. The new body was established to handle border management, joint boundary surveys, and trade flows along the frontier.

"There is no boundary between Pakistan and China," said Randhir Jaiswal, the spokesperson for India's Ministry of External Affairs. He dismissed the commission as having "no legal basis", adding that Pakistan has no authority to make arrangements over land under its "illegal and forcible occupation."

Who is involved

The diplomatic row centres on the geopolitical realities of Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh. India claims these entire regions as integral and inalienable parts of its territory, including the areas currently administered by Pakistan and China.

At the heart of the dispute is the 1963 China-Pakistan Boundary Agreement, a treaty New Delhi has never recognised. Under that decades-old deal, Islamabad ceded parts of the Karakoram region to Beijing, including the Shaksgam Valley. India has long maintained that this agreement is illegal and invalid.

The meeting in Islamabad, which Pakistan’s foreign ministry described on social media as a "significant milestone" for bilateral relations, was co-chaired by Li Ya, a deputy director general in China's foreign ministry, and Bilal Mahmood Chaudhary, Pakistan’s director general for China. They discussed increasing coordination along the 590-kilometre stretch where Pakistani-controlled Kashmir meets Chinese-administered territory.

Why it matters

For India, this coordination is more than a diplomatic irritant. It is a direct challenge to its sovereignty, compounded by the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which runs through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

The dispute also plays out against a backdrop of ongoing military tensions between India and China along their own 3,488-kilometre Line of Actual Control. In recent years, the Indian military has remained on high alert along this frontier following border violations and unauthorised entries across all three sectors.

Jaiswal made it clear that New Delhi will not accept any attempt to legitimise the status of these territories.

"Instead of engaging in such theatrics, we call on Pakistan to immediately vacate from areas under its illegal and forcible occupation," Jaiswal said. He added that any purported boundary cooperation between Beijing and Islamabad would have "no bearing whatsoever on India's sovereignty over these territories."

Found an error in this story? Write to editor@theindiadecade.com. Our corrections policy explains how we put mistakes right.

Key numbers

Year of contested China-Pakistan Boundary Agreement
1963
Source: Ministry of External Affairs, India
Length of border in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir
590 km
Source: Official boundary records
Line of Actual Control length
3,488 km
Source: Official boundary records

In this story

  • Randhir Jaiswal — Spokesperson for India's Ministry of External Affairs who rejected the commission.
  • Ladakh — Indian union territory claimed as an inalienable part of India.
  • Jammu and Kashmir — Disputed territory claimed by India, currently divided in administration.
  • Ministry of External Affairs — Indian government ministry that issued the rejection statement.

Topics

The day’s reporting, once each morning. No advertising.

More on this story