Dubai NRI wins relief on Rs 3.41 crore FCNR tax notice
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Jaipur ruled that a Dubai‑based woman’s FCNR deposits were not unexplained money, overturning a Section 69A notice after finding the assessing officer had misread Japanese‑yen amounts as rupees.

What happened
A woman originally from Beawar, now residing in Dubai, faced a tax notice under Section 69A for "unexplained money" worth Rs 3.41 crore. The notice related to two foreign‑currency non‑resident (FCNR) term deposits held jointly with her husband. On 22 September 2026 the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Jaipur ruled in her favour, deleting the addition entirely.
Why the tribunal intervened
The assessing officer (AO) had asked IndusInd Bank for details on 9 November 2022 under Section 133(6). The bank replied, confirming that the deposits were funded from a joint NRE account and that the husband, Mr Chand, was the first holder. The AO, however, mistakenly read the Japanese‑yen (JPY) amounts – 1.726 crore JPY and 1.658 crore JPY – as rupee figures and added Rs 3.41 crore to the wife’s tax liability.
ITAT members Kuldip Singh (Judicial) and Prakash (Accountant) noted the error, stating that the principal in yen amounted to JPY 3.384 crore, equivalent to roughly Rs 2 crore, not the Rs 3.41 crore the department had claimed. Because the husband had already explained the source of the funds and the department had not challenged the bank’s records, the same funds could not be treated as "unexplained" for the wife, who was only a second holder.
Legal context
Section 69A targets money whose nature or source cannot be satisfactorily explained. For non‑resident Indians (NRIs), only income received or deemed received in India is taxable under Section 5(2). Rahul Jain, partner at Khaitan & Co, explained that interest on NRE‑held funds is exempt, and the principal is generally not taxable. The tribunal affirmed that no taxable Indian income was identified.
Implications
The ruling highlights two important points for the broader tax administration. First, it shows that the system can self‑correct when technical mistakes – such as confusing currency denominations – occur. Second, it reassures NRIs that legitimate investments backed by clear bank documentation will not be arbitrarily labelled as unexplained.
Key numbers
| Description | Amount | Currency |
|---|---|---|
| First FCNR deposit | 1.726 crore | JPY |
| Second FCNR deposit | 1.658 crore | JPY |
| Total principal | 3.384 crore | JPY |
| Rupee equivalent of total | ~2 crore | INR |
| Tax addition originally levied | 3.41 crore | INR |
The tribunal’s decision restores the correct tax position for the taxpayer and sends a clear message that due process and accurate assessment are essential pillars of India’s fiscal framework.
Key numbers
| What | Figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Tax notice amount | Rs 3.41 crore | ITAT Jaipur order |
| FCNR deposit amounts (JPY) | 1.726 crore JPY and 1.658 crore JPY | ITAT Jaipur order |
| Total JPY principal | JPY 3.384 crore | ITAT Jaipur order |
| Rupee equivalent of deposits | ~Rs 2 crore | ITAT Jaipur order |
| Date of tribunal ruling | 22 September 2026 | ITAT Jaipur order |
In this story
| Name | Role in the story |
|---|---|
| Mrs Khanwani | Dubai‑based NRI taxpayer who appealed the notice |
| ITAT Jaipur | Income Tax Appellate Tribunal that delivered the judgment |



