White House pledges to respect Federal Reserve's independence ahead of tough rate decision
The President's top economic adviser says Donald Trump '100% respects' the central bank's independence, but admits a rate hike would not make him 'super happy'.

The Trump administration has pledged to respect the independence of Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh, even as the central bank prepares for a highly anticipated and potentially tense interest rate decision this Wednesday.
Speaking on television on Sunday, the director of the White House National Economic Council, Kevin Hassett, said that President Donald Trump '100% respects the independence of Kevin Warsh' and would '100% support' whatever the Fed decides.
But the supportive words come with a clear caveat. Hassett conceded that the President would not be 'super happy' if the Fed decides to lift borrowing costs. He also warned that changing rates so close to an election could raise questions about the central bank’s reputation for staying out of politics.
For Warsh, who took over the top job on May 22, the decision is a major test. Investors are widely expecting a quarter-point increase on Wednesday, which would be the first rate hike in three years and would lift the benchmark rate to around 3.9%.
What is driving the rate pressure?
Since Warsh took charge, the economic picture has grown more complicated. A prolonged conflict with Iran has pushed energy prices higher, while new tariffs and surging demand from the artificial intelligence boom have fed inflation.
The Fed’s preferred measure showed inflation hitting 3.7% in July, up from 2.3% in April 2025, before the administration's tariffs took effect. Core inflation, which strips out food and energy, reached 3.3% in July, up from 3% before the outbreak of the war with Iran.
This sticky inflation has spooked the bond market. The yield on the 10-year US Treasury note touched 5% this week, crossing that threshold for the first time in three years and pushing up mortgage rates in the process.
Some economists argue that a rate hike now might actually help lower long-term borrowing costs by reassuring investors that the Fed is serious about inflation. On the other hand, if Warsh holds rates steady, it could look like he is bowing to political pressure from a President who spent much of last year demanding rate cuts.
A history of tension
The relationship between the White House and the Fed has been fraught in the past. During his first term, Trump frequently attacked former Fed Chair Jerome Powell over the pace of monetary easing. The Department of Justice even launched an investigation into Powell’s congressional testimony, though that probe was later dropped.
By contrast, Trump has repeatedly stated that he trusts Warsh to 'do the right thing', sparing him the public lashings his predecessor received. Wednesday’s decision will show whether that truce can survive its first real disagreement.
If the Fed does act, it is not yet clear whether it will be a single, defensive move or the start of a broader campaign. Some economists point to 1997, when Alan Greenspan raised rates once by a quarter point before the Asian financial crisis forced the Fed to hold steady and eventually cut rates.
For now, Wall Street is betting on a tougher path, with many investors pricing in three rate hikes by next March. UBS economist Jonathan Pingle noted that the Fed could still pivot if upcoming data shows inflation cooling. The central bank's quarterly economic projections, due on Wednesday, will provide the first real clues.
Key numbers
- 3.7%
- 3.3%
- 5%
- 3.9%



